Tuesday, August 21, 2012


Living in India? Think before getting a US green card

Lakshmi Iyer and her husband Ganesh have been living in Bangalore, India for the last 40 years. Recently, their son, a US citizen, sponsored their Green Card and they are now US Green Card holders.

For the Iyers, presently the Green Card is just an easier access route to the US. It will enable them visit the US anytime and stay for any length of time. They do not intend to move to the US right away. Perhaps, at some point in the future they would make the move, but they have not made up their minds yet.

But convenience aside, there are certain tax and compliance issues that are extremely important before taking a decision to get a Green Card without actually living in the US. "A few years ago, it may not have been very grave to fail in these compliances. But today, the IRS is increasing its focus on offshore assets. It is very important for individuals to assess the consequences before they apply for their Green Card," advices Roy Vargis, Illinois based CPA and promoter of www.IndianCPA.com

Let's look at what these issues and their consequences are.

US will tax your global income

Unlike India, the US tax law is based on residency as well as citizenship. That is, the US taxes both, its residents and citizens on their global income irrespective of where they live. Resident in this case is defined as either a green card holder or someone who is physically present in the US for a certain number of days in the year. India on the other hand, taxes only its residents on global income. That is, Indian citizens who do not live in India are taxed in India only on their India income and not their global income.

This basic difference poses several challenges for US Green Card holders. If you are a Green Card holder living in India, you would qualify as a resident in India and therefore will have to pay taxes and file returns in India on your global income. However, as a Green Card holder, you are obligated to file your tax returns in the US and declare your global income there. So if you are a resident of India and earn a pension in India, you would be taxed in India and you would also need to show this pension income in the US tax return. This income will be taxed in the US as per tax rates in the US, which could be more or less than what you are charged in India. Having said that, you will get relief under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and the US. That means, if you have paid taxes in India on a particular income, you will get a credit tax that extent in the US. However, you will still have to file your US tax returns.

Moreover, if certain incomes are tax-free in India, such as dividends or interest on provident funds, they will be taxed in the US.

"Green Card holders who are living outside of USA and have 'earned income' will be able to avail of the earned income exclusion of up to $95100 in 2012. Earned income here would include salary, commissions and self employed income. Pensions and annuities, capital gains, rental income, interest and dividends are not considered as earned income," Vargis adds.

Declaration of foreign assets in US

Recently, the US Treasury Department has been closely monitoring foreign income-generating assets of its residents and citizens in order to track tax evaders. Several regulations and compliance measures have been put in place for this.

The first - Foreign Bank and Financial Account Report (FBAR) is a report that must be filed by all residents and citizens who have foreign financial assets exceeding USD 10000 in a particular calendar year. The report must be filed by June 30th of each year and collects information on all foreign financial assets including banks account, demat account, mutual funds, insurance policies, provident fund schemes etc.

The second more recent is Form 8938 - Statement of Foreign Financial Assets. This form was introduced this year and has to be filed along with the tax return. The form collects details that are similar to the FBAR except for a few differences such as threshold limits.

The intention of both these forms is to verify if the taxpayer has declared income from foreign assets in his US tax return. So as a Green Card holder, you would be obliged to file these reports in the US even if you are not living there.

"The consequence of failure is very harsh. Penalties can be up to 50% of value of overseas assets. So it can potentially wipe out your savings," Vargis cautions.

US Estate taxes and Gift taxes will apply

"As soon as you become a Green Card holder you will attract US Estate and Gift taxes irrespective of where you live," Rajesh Vaidya, a CPA and Senior Accountant at Florida based Raju Maniar CPA firm explains.

Estate tax is payable by the heirs from the estate of a deceased individual and can be as high as 55%. The basic exemption limit is presently USD 5.12 million. This tax is payable if the deceased individual was a US resident, Green Card holder or citizen, irrespective of location of estate. "So as a Green Card holder, your India assets would be subject to estate tax when they are passed on as inheritance," Vaidya adds.

Similar rules apply in case of gift tax. The donor of the gift is liable to pay gift tax in the US if he is a US resident, Green Card holder or citizen irrespective of who he is making the gift to. There are two levels of exemption from the gift tax. First, gifts of up to the annual exclusion of USD13,000 per recipient incur no tax or filing requirement. Second, gifts in excess of the annual exclusion may still be tax-free up to USD 5,120,000. Anything above that will be taxed at up to 55%.

However, Vaidya also adds, "These exemption limits and rates are as per current laws which were part of the famous Bush Tax Cuts. In December 2012, these rates are set to expire, and unless the Congress extends these cuts, they are likely to change. The basic exemption in that case is likely to go down to USD 1 million."

Now, in case you are receiving gifts, in certain cases, you would need to fill up Form 3520 along with your tax return. "You would need to file this form if during the tax year, you received a gift or bequest valued at more than $100,000 from a nonresident individual or foreign estate," Vargis adds.

PFIC rules will apply

Passive Foreign Investment Corporation (PFIC) rules were introduced by the IRS in order to discourage the practice of US investors parking money in offshore tax havens and then deferring the US tax liability. However, due to the nature of the laws, this attracts even foreign mutual fund investments of US residents, Green Card holders and citizens. Broadly speaking, according to the PFIC rules, if you are a Green Card holder with investments in Indian mutual funds, you will face some harsh tax consequences unless you choose one of the options in Form 8621 at the time they file US tax returns. These options essentially seek to tax notional gains on an annual basis instead of taxing gains at the time of sale.

In case you decide not to make any election, you will face some severe consequences at the time you sell their investments. This is called the 'excessive distribution method.' According to this option, the distributions in the current year should be at least 125 percent of the average distributions of last three years. If this condition is not met, then the total distributions are allocated over the entire holding period and are taxed in each year at the highest tax rate of that year. Not only that, but interest will also be charged on each year's tax liability.

"What makes matters more difficult is that the 'statute of limitation' on a return does not begin to run until all required foreign reporting has been complied with including. That is, while ordinarily the IRS has the right to go back and audit your returns of the last 3 years, in case of non compliance, it can go back as many years as it wants," says Vargis.

Declaration of financial interest in Indian entities

"Forms 5471 and 8865 are triggered when a US resident, citizen or Green Card holder have some financial interest in foreign corporations or foreign partnerships," says Vargis.

So if you have a stake in an Indian company or are a director or officer of an Indian company, you may need to file Form 5471 (for companies) or 8865 (for partnerships) and declare your interest. There are certain conditions that apply in case of both forms. What is important is that the penalties are very high. There is a penalty of $10,000 for each year for failing to file the form.

Another Form 926 was also introduced recently. This form captures information on any transfers of property or funds by a US person to a foreign corporation.

"All these forms intend to capture information about the US person's financial interest in overseas assets and investments. The IRS will be able to track if the taxpayer has reported all of their income appropriately in the tax return," Vargis explains.

Consequences of failure to adhere

"To begin with, the penalties of failure to file any of these reports and forms if you qualify will draw harsh penalties. Like we have seen, the penalties in case of FBAR can be as high as 50% of the value of your foreign assets. In addition to the penalties, you may face consequences in your immigration status. At the time of renewal of your Green Card or when you apply for citizenship, the authorities will ask to see your past US income tax returns. In case your papers are not in order, you may not get a renewal or citizenship," Vargis explains.

Action

Vaidya advices, "Most elderly people opt for Green Card to unite and stay with children as they foresee hurdles in obtaining visas and traveling. My advice for high networth individuals is to evaluate the situation carefully for future issues arising for tax compliance in US as well as in India for wealth tax issues as well."

"My advice is that if you are a wealthy individual with significant assets and financial interests in India, think twice before you apply for your Green Card. Unless you plan to move permanently to the US getting a Green Card may pose more challenges than conveniences. It may not be as much of a problem for those with lower income or smaller assets in India," Vargis concludes.

Here's When Other Facebook Insiders Can Sell Stock

Published: Tuesday, 21 Aug 2012 | 3:58 PM ET
Text Size
By: Reuters
Mark Zuckerberg
Getty Images

Last week, Facebook's early investors and some directors became eligible to sell stock they own in the social networking company. Others will have similar rights in the coming months.
Up to 1.91 billion more shares could flood the stock market — more than four times the 421 million shares that had been trading sinceFacebook's [FB  19.159    -0.852  (-4.26%)   ]initial public offering in May.
Facebook's stock has fallen since last Thursday's expiration of the first lock-up period. On Monday, it's disclosed that Peter Thiel, one of Facebook's earliest investors and a member of its board, was among the insiders selling stock after the lock-up period expired. He sold about 20 million shares through affiliates for $19.27 to $20.69 each. (Read More: Investor Thiel Unloads Most of His Facebook Shares)
Here's the schedule, as reported by Facebook in a regulatory filing:
  • Aug. 16: 271 million shares held by early investors and directors who had participated in the IPO, though CEO Mark Zuckerberg is excluded for unspecified reasons.
  • Unspecified date between Oct. 15 and Nov. 13: 243 million shares and stock options held by directors and former or current employees, excluding Zuckerberg. 
  • Nov. 14: 1.22 billion shares and stock options, about a third of which is controlled by Zuckerberg. 
  • Dec. 14: 149 million shares held by early investors and others who participated in IPO, except Zuckerberg. 
  • May 18, 2013: 47 million shares held by the Russian Internet company Mail.ru Group and DST Global, both of which made early investments in Facebook.

email: tech@cnbc.com
Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.
COMPANIES:Facebook

Say Goodnight Peter? Thiel Should Quit Facebook Board: Pro

Published: Tuesday, 21 Aug 2012 | 2:50 PM ET
Text Size
By: Cadie Thompson
Technology Editor, CNBC.com
Peter Thiel
Source: thielfoundation.org
Peter Thiel, technology entrepreneur, investor, and philanthropist.

By dumping his Facebook shares as soon as he could, investor Peter Thiel has shown he's not committed to the social network in the long-term and should step down from the board of directors, an analyst said to CNBC.
It was revealed Monday Thiel sold about 20 million shares worth about $1 billion last Thursday — the majority of his stake inFacebook [FB  19.159    -0.852  (-4.26%)   ] — after the lock-up expired for insiders, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. He retains 5.6 million shares. The move surprised some analysts, given that Thiel was one of Facebook's earliest investors.
Michael Pachter, a senior analyst at Wedbush Securities, said Tuesday onCNBC's Squawk on the Street that Thiel is "certainly sending a signal that he has a lack of commitment to the stock."

The analyst added: "I don't think Thiel is interested in a long term investor in Facebook. I think he made his money...and I think since he doesn't have a long term commitment to this company he should step aside from the board," he said.
While some investors are worried that Thiel's stock sale signals Facebook is a sinking ship, Pachter said Thiel's move was really just a matter of cashing in on his investment.
"I think this guy saw his payday, he chose to exit, exploit his payday and move on," Pachter said. "I'm not sure he knows anything more than any of the other insiders, none of whom apparently who sold significant amounts of stock." 
Early investors are ready to cash in on their initial cash infusion, and selling stock to is well within their rights, he said. Investors should expect more people to sell when the next lock-up expires in November, Pachter added.
As for Thiel, Pachter stated that his unloading of Facebook's stock spoke volumes. "I think right now if shareholders were to vote, that guy would not get reelected."

Monday, August 20, 2012


Facebook: The Worst IPO Ever?

Video Player Controls

Shares of Facebook (FB) hit another record low, trading down over 3% today. The selling spree began yesterday with a 6% tumble to a record closing low of $19.87 a share. The sell-off is attributed to the expiration of the company's first lockup period allowing 271 million restricted shares to become eligible for sale by institutional holders. Facebook shares traded almost 10x average daily volume and struggled to find buyers for the last two days, suggesting the institutions in question, including Goldman Sachs (GS) and hedge fund titans Tiger Global Management could be dumping shares. (See:Facebook Shares Plunge as Insider Lockup Expires)
There's no objective measure for "worst IPO ever" but Facebook is the standard to which all future stock offerings will be held. Shares are down nearly 50% from where the IPO was priced on May 18th, but the money lost is what makes Facebook historically terrible. "$60 billion evaporated inside of 3 months; it's staggering," says Breakout co-host Matt Nesto.
The bulk of the $60 billion loss came out of the pockets of market newcomers in love with the idea of investing in Facebook or lured in by endless months of pre-IPO hype. Wall Street looks forward, not backwards, so the only thing that matters now is whether existing shareholders of Facebook stock should sell or consider this a buying opportunity on the seemingly endless drop in the share price.
"If you've held it from $38 to $20 and you haven't sold yet, why would you sell now?" Nesto says, offering what passes for a buy thesis on Facebook these days. There's not a one-to-one connection between the fortunes of a company and it's stock price. Particularly in the case of newly public concerns like Facebook, it takes time for a stock to find it's so called "right price." There's a case to be made that Facebook's stock is being impacted by artificial forces like yesterday's lock-up and the much larger one to come in November.
"The company itself hasn't really changed," Nesto offers. But this inadvertently touches on the bearish case. Facebook's lousy fundamentals became clear when the company had to open its books to go public. FB has slowing growth and no tangible plan to monetize its massive user base. We knewthis before and it remains true today. Hoping Facebook figures out how to gather more than $4 per user in revenue per year isn't an investment thesis.
Those who've been long Facebook all the way down need to be honest with themselves. It's time to stop hiding from brokerage statements or convincing themselves that they "invest for the long-haul" so don't care about losses. Nothing is promised in life, including and especially Facebook's stock recovering. Those who are spending sleepless nights hoping and praying the stock will go higher own too much of it. They are bait to Wall Street sharks, whether they know it or not.
You can try anything you want on Wall Street as long as you have an exit plan. It's long past time for Facebook shareholders to start considering Plan B.
Do you think Facebook will end this year above or below its IPO price of $38 a share? Please answer our poll question below!

Facebook director Thiel sold 20 million shares after lockup

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
FB20.0110.96
Yahoo! Finance Portfolio
By Alexei Oreskovic
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Facebook Inc director Peter Thiel sold roughly $400 million worth of shares in the Internet social networking company last week, cashing out most of his stake, according to a regulatory filing.
Thiel sold his shares on Thursday and Friday at average prices ranging between $19.27 and $20.69 per share after the end of the first lockup, which barred early investors and insiders from selling shares following the initial public offering.
The sales, in which Thiel sold roughly 20 million Facebook shares, were conducted as a result of a trading plan that Thiel entered into on May 18, according to the filing.
Thiel, who co-founded PayPal and was among Facebook's earliest backers, still owns roughly 5.6 million shares of Facebook. A spokesman for Thiel declined to comment on the sales.
Accel Partners, a Silicon Valley venture capital firm that was also an early backer of Facebook, distributed roughly 57.8 million Facebook shares to the limited partners and general partners of its various funds on Thursday, according to another filing. The move allows those partners to sell or hold on to their distributed Facebook shares as they see fit.
Facebook, founded by Mark Zuckerberg in his Harvard University dorm room, became the only U.S. company to debut with a market value of more than $100 billion. But investors have grown disillusioned with Facebook's inability to articulate a plan to reverse slowing revenue growth.
Shares of Facebook finished Monday's regular trading session at $20.01, down nearly 50 percent from their $38 offering price in May.
More than 1.4 billion additional shares held by early investors and Facebook employees are set to become available for trading by year's end, as additional post-IPO lockup restrictions are lifted.
(Reporting By Alexei Oreskovic; Editing by Phil Berlowitz)
(This story was corrected fix the number of shares distributed by Accel to 57.8 million)

Sunday, August 5, 2012


10 Reasons You're Not the Boss

Wondering why you can't get promoted to a managerial position? One or more of these 10 common problems might be the reason why:
1. You don't look the part. It might seem superficial and unfair, but appearances really do count. You might get away with pushing your office's dress code to the limit, but it's probably impacting the way people perceive you and what opportunities you're offered.
2. You're terrible at time management. Managers need to keep track not only of their work, but also keep track of other people's too. If you can't stay on top of your own projects, your employer isn't likely to have faith that you'll be able to monitor the work of an entire team.
3. You aren't very good at tough conversations. A manager needs to have tough conversations, make decisions that may be unpopular, and enforce standards and consequences. If you shy away from difficult conversations--or the opposite, if you're too aggressive and confrontational in them--you likely won't be seen as manager material.
4. You gossip or are part of a clique. Managers need to be unbiased and objective--and not only that, they need to appear unbiased too. If you've already crossed professional boundaries within the office, it will be difficult to rebuild those lines as a manager.
5. You don't know how to prioritize. Managers need to look at a landscape of dozens of possible projects and identify the most important ones to spend time and resources on--and then stay focused on those goals without letting distractions intervene. If you already have trouble figuring out the best place to spend your time, the problems would only compound.
6. You act entitled. Entitlement from someone at a junior level is hard enough to deal with; entitlement in a manager is even worse. No employer wants to deal with a manager who thinks her department deserves a higher budget or more staff allocations than everyone else, or who tries toexempt herself from the policies and procedures that everyone else has to follow.
7. You don't manage your own boss well. The ability to manage upward gets more and more important as you move up the ladder. If you're not skilled at managing your relationship with your manager now--including communicating well, getting aligned on expectations, and getting her what she needs in the manner she prefers it--it's likely to hold you back from higher-level roles.
8. You're a complainer. Managers need to have the maturity and perspective to understand how policies that might be annoying still serve the larger good of the company. They also need the judgment to raise concerns professionally and through the correct channels, rather than sharing them with anyone who will listen.
9. You do your job duties and nothing else. Average work might satisfy the requirements of your current job, but it's not enough to get you promoted. Promotions go to people who go above and beyond the minimum and seek out ways to improve constantly.
10. You don't make your accomplishments visible. You might be doing a fantastic job, but if no one knows that, you won't be rewarded for it. So don't be shy about sharing accomplishments with your manager, whether it's rave reviews from a client or a tricky problem that you solved before it caused damage.
Alison Green writes the popular Ask a Manager blog, where she dispenses advice on career, job search, and management issues. She's also the co-author of Managing to Change the World: The Nonprofit Manager's Guide to Getting Results, and former chief of staff of a successful nonprofit organization, where she oversaw day-to-day staff management, hiring, firing, and employee development.